For one-on-one street fighting defense, would you train in Judo or Ju-Jitsu?

Judo originally derived from ju-jitsu, taking more of a sport approach, which means its not as in-depth as far as learning groundfighting techniques.





Neither discipline touches upon striking techniques. Judo will show you alot of takedowns, sweeps, throws, clinches, and how to fall and some groundfighting. Ju-jitsu will show you that and go more in-depth into groundfighting with joint manipulation, chokes, sleepers, cranks, and other submission techniques.





Against someone thats not trained in anything, either should be effective, but it also depends on the person who's executing the techniques. If you don't exercise, smoke, and have Big Macs for every meal, just knowing some judo or ju-jitsu may not help much in a fight.

For one-on-one street fighting defense, would you train in Judo or Ju-Jitsu?
Ju-Jitsu works for me.
Reply:Go with Judo. Ju-Jitsu is good for defense but Judo is based on Ju-Jitsu and incorporates much of the same ground defense into the martial art yet teaches you some other great techniques (most known for spectacular throwing techniques)
Reply:both work for street fighting...ju jitsu may have the best locks that can make you tap out but judo has its extreme throws that can break your bone.,
Reply:It depends on if you think you will be needing to defend yourself from one person or more, if more than one person, train in Judo, in which there is more emphasis on staying on one's feet as compared to Ju-Jitsu.
Reply:Definitely Jiu Jitsu..!!
Reply:I go for jiu-jitsu, more techniques to learn than judo.
Reply:i would go with PINCHE cabron, check out my super foot ! take pilates....pansy how about them 10 points??
Reply:Assuming you mean Japanese jujitsu (as opposed to Brazilian), I'd go with the jujitsu. It includes striking and breaking techniques that are absent in Judo. However, jujitsu is harder to learn--keep that in mind.
Reply:Good luck finding a 1v1 street fight -_-